The political game "monopoly": "Make your bets, gentlemen!" Print E-mail
User Rating: / 1
PoorBest 
Written by Юрий РужинÑкий   
Wednesday, 02 April 2008
The text of the original in Russian 


(Work was written prior to the events in Ukraine in 2004) 

  The whole world is slowly sliding into an era of global irresponsibility - a lie became an indispensable feature of the day and our lives. 
 Moreover, we are not only themselves and each other, but also consume huge amounts of lies the media (newspapers, television, radio). Furthermore, we commend their life and destiny of their state officials, politicians and MPs, a lie which has become the main tool of production (labor): without their loud and populist promises to "none" and "nothing." And we, obviously knowing that we obolvanivayut and durachat as the most recent "lohov, however, agree to regularly deceive themselves, constantly hoping for something better (and what remains?). 
Progress and intensive development of Humankind simply inconceivable without a high level of responsibility for his words and his actions of each individual community. 
Perhaps it is from these positions and to start the modernization of the political-legal and socio-economic transformation. 
Take, for example, the state system of government. 

 The vast number of countries has an electoral system of government (legislative and executive), where the people delegate their representatives, with an interval of 4-7 years. However, in most cases is a sad situation when after the conclusion of the election campaign the people of almost losing control over their elected. 
It turns out that the country is in itself, but officials deputies - by themselves. Often, the last use of his position in favor of its mercantile financial interests, which often run counter to the national or even hurt them. 
I believe that every product must be inherently political to the economic track. For example, a certain political party (or bloc of parties), going to the elections, declares certain specific program of development of the country in numbers. In this case, they came to power committed to fulfill it, then it is (the size of GDP, external debt, domestic debt, the consumer basket, the size of investment).
To take part in the election campaign, each party, the applicant (or a block party) must be made in a foreign mortgage bank with a reputation for excellence is a big deposit in the amount of several billion dollars (equivalent). In the case of winning the election, this amount remains in the bank collateral for the entire term of office and is a financial guarantor in the event of a failed economic policy, which guarantees some compensation for damages. 
The amount of collateral is the party of personal financial investments, as well as from obschepartiynyh Finance. Personal tools make the first 30 members of the party (on the party list) of $ 3 to $ 5 million. In the bond may be real estate, personal savings, securities, credit in the bank, business, etc. Obschepartiynaya deposit cash should be based primarily on bank loans. Thus, we get a very interesting pattern of political-economic interaction with the people of power, when the deputies, risking not only the confidence of their constituents, but also his personal property, forming the government and actually represent the life of all its election promises. If they do not fulfill their promises, they are partially or completely lose all their possessions (become bankrupt). It is fact that a major bank credit under the political-economic program will be available only with a realistic and reasonable numbers of economic development.

 Moreover, the amount of several billion $ potyanet no collateral, no domestic bank, so the loan will also have to take in the major foreign banks. And this in turn is possible only after a very strict auditing and monitoring of specific economic development project. Of course, that any line of credit must be insured. This circuit automatically shuts off a financial pledge from the election and all the smaller parties failed, as well as parties and blocs populist wing, clearing the way grant policy and the economy. 
In the case of the successful implementation of all its pre-political and economic commitments, the party-government gets part of the country's GDP (per share), which not only cover the bank loan with a minimum credit rate, but still generate profits for the of pro-governmental parties. In partial fulfillment of their obligations in proportion to the rate of return is recalculated with the decrease percent of GDP, while in case of deterioration of economic indicators on the situation dovybornoy - includes forfeiture penalty-compensation program ubytkov.Dlya implementation of the possibility of political and economic security of elections is necessary to establish an international Institute of Independent Auditors. Its primary objective - to provide the population of the country, as well as all the real stakeholders of the bank of reliable economic information. First of all, it concerns dovybornogo economic situation in the country (the standard of living of the population, GDP, external and internal debt, investments, etc.). 
This will allow for subsequent annual international monitoring of the country's economy in order to really judge the actions of politicians and government and based on the findings of independent analysts of the Institute of Audit to the conclusion about the profitability or loss vlasti.Sleduet State organs separately to note that when assessing the welfare of ordinary citizens need to move from a very sly and false (but very convenient for the government) system of assessing the average wage (pensions) and its growth to the number of goods to the European standard basket of consumer. 

 This will allow to combine wages from inflationary processes in the country and show the true dynamics of the welfare of the people. 
Now Concerning the other important part of the project - our voters or the electorate. The problem is that most voters fulfill their constitutional duty, to put it mildly, not very good - vote for money, vote based on their emotions rather than reason, hang round ears mnogokilometrovoy noodles, or do not vote. And this practice is very wrong. But it would be nothing if the vast majority of blunt not hurt their electoral votes to those who really can understand both the economy and in politics, and, therefore, do indeed worthy choice. 
I believe that all voters should be held accountable for their choices and to one another (as well as deputies to the people) is not only morally but also economically. For nothing scour their brains, as a real opportunity to first of all to lose their money, rather than the abstract state. And then the old grandmother, the protesters outside the communist sausage for 2.20 prizadumayutsya because may in the short term, lost half of his retirement ... In order to implement new election procedures for all potential voters before the elections, the country must be personalize, ie give individual electoral passport (the same of your passport) with a mandatory picture, showing the place of residence and high security. During the elections, the voice of voters openly and officially entered into the Unified State Register and in election passport is relevant printed mark. Save the incognito with the new voting system is virtually impossible. 
Yes and no true citizen of the country's own hide and be ashamed of their informed choice, and only if you chose - that deign to follow up and reply! (In fact, make a few kramolnuyu thought. Perhaps it makes sense to issue passports only to those voting citizens who successfully surrender "politico-legal minimum" (test) ", thus allowing to the polls really responsible and trained persons. After all, no one is puzzling or perturbation of the fact that, in order to drive a car, you first need to get right (to pass examinations ). Similarly, - doctor, builder, teacher, policeman. I think the honorable position of a voter is also necessary to elevate the level of the profession with appropriate training and certification.) Thus, in the final election race, when the left only two political parties, we will have three types of voters: the first vote for a party and, second - for the party B, and others, feared the responsibility, or because of their own laziness, do not exercise their constitutional voting rights. As a result, those voters who voted for candidate A ( "put" to him), in the case of the victory of the party in the elections bear the full moral and material responsibility for their choices to the electorate, voted for candidate B. 
What this might be expressed? So, a year after the election of pro-governmental parties, conducted an independent international audit of the state of the economy. And if all of a sudden it turns out that economic indicators are relatively basic dovybornyh performance despite election promises and programs declined slightly, then all voters and candidates are charged an additional tax (penalty, compensation deduction) in favor of voters the candidate B (payment is made under the Electoral passports) in order to compensate for recent declines in living standards and reducing the consumption basket. 
Cash payments to voters and candidates may be withheld from wages, pensions and scholarships (for the state. Servants, but not more than 50%) and run in the form of additional tax (for business). 
In general, the compensation rate (a measure of individual responsibility) must be determined in advance of the elections, and placed in the ballot a citizen passport (as defined under the law). By increasing the extent of their financial responsibility before the elections (making a higher bid for a candidate), the voter, of course, much more at risk. 
But in the case of a candidate he can count on a much larger compensation payments. Of course, that voters are not voting (do not make bets), itself from the premium-punitive political and economic interventions. 
If the economic situation in the country (at the conclusion of the Institute of International Audit) will remain at the same level or even better, no punitive action is not performed. The system of compensation payments is primarily a safety policy in the case of "if the country will be worse." Thus, We have a unique opportunity to radically improve samosoznatelnost ordinary voters, to teach them carefully to examine every comma in the electoral program of the candidate, as otherwise may be financially affected. And if you are not sure of his choice, it is better to promolchi, itself, but do no harm to those who really understands politics and the economy does not prevent those who want to build a truly prosperous gosudarstvo.Otvetstvennost, responsibility and more responsibility. Deputies to his own country and to international lenders. People to People. And I am sure that all the political pre-gaud inherent in the current electoral system, such as itself spadet. 

 It becomes much more balanced policy, economists are accustomed to prove the rightness of their figures and facts, rather than blatant aggressive verbal head with a foam rta.Otdelno should consider when projected nationwide recession and the economy as a whole, due to unfavorable of market or the global economic crisis (eg, due to the energy crisis, or in connection with the commencement of active hostilities). In this case, both parties have in the II round of elections may, in their election programs, initially to lay the decline in GDP growth, reducing the consumption basket, etc. But they have to justify arguments, clearly and loudly state the day before the final round of elections that the electorate know that the current prosperity in the future simply impossible. 
In this installment, the applicant must specify the boundaries of the fall of the economy. And if it is subsequently retained in this framework, the compensation payments made to the voters and the voters were not made. 
If the same party, the Government was unable to hold down a part of the alleged crisis, the accelerated decline in living standards of some voters in favor of the other inevitable. It is not difficult to guess the thoughts of those voters who because of unprofessional actions of politicians will be forced each year to give "their blood" to his friend, a neighbor, a member of the work. The pressure on the authorities (legislative and executive) of the people multiply that make people's elected representatives more quickly and thoughtfully to take more than it was fateful resheniya.Ne to establish position, when in the case of undeclared cumulative fall of economic indicators on the basis of the entire electoral term, more than 30% is not only the total confiscation of all property as collateral the entire party as a whole and its specific members (the first 30 man roster), in particular to stabilize the economy in the country, but also necessarily automatically (without judicial procedures, on the basis of international auditing) entails criminal liability of the first 30 members of the party's list for a period of 5 years without the right of pardon and the deprivation of opportunities later to assume leadership positions for 10 years. I think that in such conditions dramatically reduced the number of the willing "porulit" for our country to you by ... For the embodiment of the concept of the electoral system you need to bring all political and legal relations in the country to a certain standard. The most acceptable (in my opinion) option is a parliamentary-presidential republic with a minimum of presidential powers (a representation). Moreover, the necessary institutions of parliamentarism, which is almost always a situation of "Swan, cancer, and pike, it seems to me highly inappropriate. If a majority vote of the people to choose one political force (party, which forms the government and appoints the President), gives it full authority and responsibility for the entire term (4-5 years), it is not worth it in every possible way interfere with the active opposition. 
Ie I plead for the one-parliament, if such it can be called.

 And do not be afraid of splicing the legislative and executive branches: only in such a symbiosis is possible intense forward any cost savings (as an example - China) any country in the world. This, of course, and the responsibility of pro-governmental party to its people must be enormous and much larger than nyneshnyaya.A now, dear reader (especially Ukrainians) read all the above again and smodeliruyte possible political and economic situation in the country in accordance with new electoral opportunities and feel the difference "... 

                                      
/ "TRAKTAT the reduction of entropy, vol II, issue number 81 /  
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh