how to make traffic police honest, movement - without «plugs», and «Rules» - effective? Print E-mail
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 
Written by Валерий Сергеевич Задоенко   
Tuesday, 17 March 2009
How to make Road police honest, movement - without «plugs», and «Rules» - effective? 
  Subject: 
  Revision of principles, interpretation and application of «Rules of the road». 
  Book review: 


  The goal of modern «Rules of the road» - 100% compliance with their rules and regulations in order to «ideally» ensure complete safety of traffic. But, despite all efforts, the severity «problems of road», not only from year to year does not decrease, but with the obvious - only grows. The reference to the «objective» increase in the number of interacting factors, which supposedly automatically multiply «necessary evil» road traffic in no way clarifies the «problem», but, rather, only darken its core - this is the initial number of «the process of multiplication». It is clear that if it was possible to significantly reduce the value of the «primary number», then «a finite amount» of losses on the road would be at least an order of magnitude lower. And it is in the revision of «original priori» Rules of the author sees untapped way more real safety on the roads - it is here, in changing the «subjective preferences» traditional logical thinking, and hidden «potency minimize» negative movement, which is quite capable now realize in fact. 

  Of course, claimed the title of «maxim» - just the ideal goal, by and large more likely - and the «good», and «unattainable», BUT IS THERE A really way «to approximation» in light of the fact that the «head in uniforms »or frankly lying periodically« podpravlyaya statistics », or« lie to ourselves »in the hope of success« bringing order »traditional methods? About «40 thousand annual fatalities Russia» - terrible, to present the picture of pain, grief, loss, which is «to sensations» no «clearing», but, on the contrary, from year to year only gathering, «tuchneet», exacerbated by . Is there any real ways to curb the bloodthirsty «Monster Dorog», with which the daily, hourly, or will captivity comes almost every one of us? 
  That is: How often do we ask ourselves to reflect on the work of activated itself creature Man «problems with the car», with which we are permanently and constantly fighting - but which, nevertheless, stifled and zlobstvuyut «the stronger - than more» potentially irreversible growth «quantitatively-broken» indicators? Not all there is the case in t.naz. «Logical thinking», giving a «very satisfactory» result in particular, but «a sebyalyubivoy EUSR» categorically unable to reconsider «itself» even thinking glaring extreme inefficiency once found «traditional management solutions» challenges in general? .. . No tea «even when life» ripen the fruit of the ideas here, the question of alternatives «spirit» and «pathos» acting now «Rules of the road», I think, however - already «useful», because the focus is (so to speak - from the «feeding») at all «cumulate» nabivshem oskominu negative and road traffic. 
  Who would argue: the multiplicity of interacting components contains a necessary evil - the risk «coincidence», where «the number N» Accidents on the roads mathematically rigorously deterministic and «minimum» predetermined. Even aside from the «factors behind the wheel», «technical condition», «quality roads», etc., the very notion of «TRAFFIC» - the opposite of «ideal of accident-free», or otherwise - in the «residues» necessarily contain physically fatal « statistics catastrophe ». But the «minimum arithmetic» and real «maximum» (ie, the fact that we have evidence on the road) there is always the «large difference», filled subjective - so that you can either demagogic «razlinovat in boxes», as it aspires prisnoderzhavnaya «Road Regulations» - tirelessly «overwrite person» drivers. Or - on the contrary, try to capture the regularities in the Lyrics «personal interest», and not to break «through knee», and the reasonable use and to send her exuberant «force». Even at the everyday level, it is clear the advantage of the impact of the Second «the method of addition» to the first, where the «plus to minus» only ideally can «even zero», but the fact of «counterpoint» - the dominant prevalence of purely «negative». This disavowal, «expose» stuck in the minds «splinter» old dogma, appeals to the «100-percent compliance with the Rules» - invective from the field all the same «good wishes», that «the road to hell is paved with», and is devoted to basic pathos of this article . 
  Tykaya index finger points in the «Rules of the road» is not desirable «vyplesnut together with water and Child»: do not cover the eyes of hysteria - not to lose a species, that is, above all, is about movement, about the objective realization of the development process, where FREEDOM MOVEMENT - almost the most important accomplishment, and the advantage of «modern man». All components of the motor of progress - the power, reliability, speed, comfort, efficiency, design and so on. - Directly linked to the «subjective specificity» of car, with its features - as one of the main «practical tools» self Personalities. «Who is much wanted, he went back and» - in the «mnogogolovom» REFRACTIVE INDEX «regulations Regulation», through the prism of the individual psyche, and is subjective background of road traffic - its exclusive specificity - which may be compared are not other kinds of «transportation». If all other types of «movement» - on the tracks, «pipes», in the air, on water - you can (and should!) Automated, reducing to the limit (if at all - delete) «subjective factor», then driving directly presence of «individual» - an unconditional prerequisite for its functioning. 
  Nevertheless, the bound prescribed as «universally-screen algorithm», everywhere and for all «transportation» the same way, although obviously aware that people are not robots, they do not insert «microchips with the categorical imperative». Therefore, «ubiquitous, universal, literal» enforcement initially - a hopeless utopian, failure «bogey for a crowd» - only manipulates high the banner of «safety on the roads», which in fact conceals the futility of spray forces and means, «legitimized» corruption and Official arbitrariness ... otherwise - an expanding metastasis «nonsense logic» and fretting all «demagogic rzha». 
  Conventional nature of the regulation of traffic involves the letter and spirit «Regulation»: «one» is predpisyvayusche-literal character, «second» is predicated upon the purpose and meaning «Decisions of the Government». But if «Letter» oveschestvlena in terms of, paragraphs and paragraphs, the «spirit» Regulation - ie, the Security Council on the roads - in the text are not given «special place»: it is only «invisible presence» in the implications - and hardly not in every line. But it is not going to be cunning and keen to «balance» the two on the right peer parts: «Letter» not just dominate «Spirit» - it is wiped clean of «the face of the earth». If the violation specified in the list «letter prescriptions» Rules is «fiscal function» with a completely oschutitelnymi for the consequences of the purse, then, say, «educative function» - a direct expression «the spirit of the Rules» - has long been hopelessly distorted, being reduced all the same «Attorney» - especially to a fine or to «Alternative» - fees for roads. But thus, in fact, «the prevention of violations», with its system of «preventive punishment in the educational purposes» meaningless. In fact, if I was fined for the purpose of «to secure the future of» others, what do «upbringing» can talk as long as that cause direct damage to MY purse? With the same success can be «thank science» thief, rapist, robber ... of course, and to me as an individual «shape morality» Rules, in principle, «there is no case», the more so as just «amoralkoy» they breathe ... If, however, Finally, keep in mind the «effectiveness of preventive measures» in general, why the rule «presumption of innocence» works against the defendants (and most often - «criminals»), a good (in the vast majority of) citizens have to pay as a front - for more imperfect accident (in fact the purpose of «prevention» we are likely to shtrafuya and «educate»!)? Yes, and whether fines «educate» deliberately and systematically to build up an emergency situation «avtonagletsa»? If the evidence - not, on what «the effectiveness of education», you can even say, as long as the edge of sanctions «cuts for a living» the primary - «normal», adult, «civilized», by definition - a lot of driving ... 
  If «Letter Rules» clear, fixed, and is crystal clear to all participants in the movement, the «spirit» the document because of its «contextually» and «implicitly», susceptible «interpretation» - that is, one way or another «interpretation». Hence, this «viscous swamp», a direct link postulate «the rules must be observed» the real «traffic safety» ends - via «a witch-hunt», or - is replaced by knowingly and objectively impossible, but istoshno «solved» challenge everywhere «hundred percent compliance »Rules. The priority of this dogma prejudges the whole pathos of the activities of the State Inspection - Service, ostensibly designed to combine the letter and spirit of «Rules». In fact, almost everything comes down to pro - to the virtual-letter «phantom VIOLATIONS», senselessness and futility of «catch» atrofirovaniyu which leads to the final level of logical circuits - their own safety. How many of lives could be saved, do not stop «гаишник» in wait, does not fix footling breach, not «brought up brought up» - while patrolling on the site, identifying the real obstacles movement «in motion», controlling even the most well-known accident-hazardous place! Formal goals generate empty statements «of the work» - work which was originally «to lamp» the truth - «important» unless Statistics «for the sake of accuracy» stolid figures reflect losses. 
  Moreover, it does not seem at first glance «strange», in each case of a real danger on the road rules are not irrelevant: it is then, «a posteriori», will be installed «responsible» Violations of traffic rules, but the first question, which is absolutely also relevant for the «Right»: «Everything Is Possible And you have done, to avoid a collision?». Actually - it is to distant from the lives of «Rules» all the shares only on the «black» and «white», whereas in fact - except for very much «wild», beyond any reasonable explanation for the cases - of wine at the «time insurance» As a rule, can not be solely to blame only the «initiator». In fact, «the other party movement» is not entering the same every time «in a dark tunnel» without headlights! And he always has time to assess the situation and take appropriate action: the question - what «it»? And is not that recognized «right» formally - in fact, does not bear much of the blame for the accident. 
  Following, for example, «kettle», you are at the limit of the minimum interval is not always immediately able to guess «who is behind the wheel», and if he suddenly vzbredet skip to the head - as «put on Rules» - next to the square-decker, this «move» could be a complete surprise to you, as «normal driver» has traveled to five times «crossing trajectories», taking into account the «clumsy specificity», slow and the slowness of this type of «public transport». And as a result - run «ass», where «formal» blame you, because supposedly «not kept a distance», while «all notions» is «pot» committed unmotivated this situation «stop» - than «unreasonable surprise» provoked «violation». And such «controversy» Letters and «the intensity of movement» - weight, with the driver on the road are rarely issued to «free minute», in order to refresh the memory of the regulation of the Regulation, «more» - it is in a constant voltage proschityvaniya particular situation in advance, taking into account hundreds of rapidly changing factors, and readiness for an immediate response to the «change of environment». And in a fatal deficiency DOMINANT time for him has always been and will be «performed in front of life»: it «intersection» of your path - it adequate evaluation and faithfulness prospective assumptions. We should be full mouldering «zatverzhdennym idiot» back binoculars instead of glasses that sat down behind the wheel in motion is strictly vkatyvatsya liner rails «regulations»: little of what the real situation may be similar ogloushit «gomunkulov» for the first rotation, and is so-and-so becomes an additional «hazard» for other traffic participants - the so-called, «Memento government», causing an acute desire to enjoy slam humming and mayachaschuyu before the gaze of «correct fly», or at least to give much of it thirty meters «safe interval ». 
  That is, not contained in the Rules «imperative», but in the ability and qualifications of each of the specific rights contained to minimize the potential for both prevention and consequences of road accidents. 
  «Traffic Rules» ostensibly written «celestial» and focused almost exclusively on special and some kind of «self» Vehicles. None of «person» - there is a «tree», which made the paper on it - hemp sections for the «average Pinocchio», is «Oak» Procrustean bed «formal priorities» and bold point «gum sanctions» at the end. But the «rules of conduct» on the road is too expensive to thoughtlessly and reckless as they honor the tradition as tradition, as confidence in the force «rites and mysteries» ancestors. It is strictly «infallibility» Rules and lies GENERATOR PROBLEMS «Fools and roads» - that is, the majority of «negative motor», «according to the custom» perceived as «permanent» and «inevitable» Evil. But is only popristalnee, poglubzhe vsmotretsya face «postulate security», as suddenly «in ocular microscope» clear his extreme «pathogenic» and «virusoopasnost» - as samostiynogo Source «pandemic problems» on the road. You do not need to be seven pyadey in the forehead, to understand that the «fateful moments» traffic rules are not discharged environment: in the «real deal» to the fore come mighty «instincts of self». Perhaps the most «Frequency» and characteristic example of this - when the very last moment, barely manages to turn suddenly from the «cut» squirt you - in the «full otklyuchke» to ban the right to «abrupt maneuvers» and of the likelihood of fly «on vstrechku» or in the ditch, if not to lose control of drivability. And with that «visceral imperative», of course, nothing can do no «men in uniform», or «insights halo wisdom» legislator. And any experienced driver can tell more than one dozen «баек» about how it saved «from the accident» reaction, feeling, experience, «sixth sense», event, resource, etc. - Is it or «partner» in the movement. And where there had been «Regulation», when, to avoid the worst, often had to be «a gross way» to upset? But such cases are in heavy urban traffic in the majority in almost every day, if not once, not two in the day! That is, in a specific environment of the road accident rescues me (or vice versa - «not save») is not mythical «Care Regulation» about my safety, but also my concentration, my skills, my ability to predict. Simply put, MY safety is always a purely «my personal business», sootnosyaschimsya with the same «personal approach to business» other traffic participants. Thus, the full approach and clarify the «safety in general» actually turns «pshikom» - Pure «verbal shell» free: emasculate «spirit» Rules turns into «filkinu letter» - in the fiscal document «for the sake of convenience» zakonoispolnitelnogo treatment. Traffic Safety, as the «reality show», depends on the weight of reasons: the state of the roads and technology, environmental factors and weather conditions, skilled driving, and psychological state of the drivers, the availability of «gaps», and potentially dangerous intersections, etc. etc. It is clear that neither the Rules nor the «service in their service» all these «impellent moments» adjust together not in a position, so «security, as such,» can not and should not be their main principle. The maximum that can be «understood» the rules - an increase «security», which in turn implies «a new point of reference», ie, to relate the real solution to this problem with her real roots, since «phenomenon implicitly and a priori» - primary defect existing «Rules of the road», for which clings «state demagoguery» and which is also overbuild extremely inefficient, cumbersome and flawed system «egoobespecheniya». In contrast golosloviyu principle of «security» needed formulated and recorded a new main principle of «the Regulation», which, on the one hand, would have been so common that «came to a» the rest worked for years and justifiable «its necessity» regulatory sections and paragraphs governing the movement and, on the other - are so specific, so tangibly-burning that «as the fresh blood in the snow» impetus to «life» FEELINGS excitement, and with it a steady increase road safety. 
  It seems that the postulate «road capacity» is precisely meet these requirements. 
  There is no problem of road (mostly) non-movement «the road»: the provision of «capacity», and hence the implementation of the «Movement». Within the limits of existing roads, in the real «crossing values» Book this principle implies the maximum possible removal of traffic interference. Only that impedes movement (pedestrians - including), non-limiting or destabilize it, and should be a priority «Regulation», justifying and conditioning of their regulatory framework. It is here laid yet unrealized potential of «vsamdelishnogo» improve safety on the roads. Thus, contrary to the backward-established tradition, «Rules of the road» must renounce sacral slogan «security», to ensure the safety of this: so to say - give it a new impetus and raise to a higher level. Paphos, «The Spirit» Regulation should aim at creating MAXIMUM «traffic conditions», where «the capacity of roads» - the most important condition, though, of course, not unique. But the «other conditions» (such as documentation of the rights to manage, repair and maintenance of vehicles, psychophysiological readiness drivers, etc..) - This is not the physical implementation of the movement, not «Contact Form», but only a preparation for the movement, its so-called -- «advance». And they obemlyutsya «basic postulate», as «the capacity of road» is not «is a» - and «to traffic», and thus pre-conditions of «interested» Rules to the extent that affect the quality of motion and ultimately can be expressed as «kolichestvennno», oposreduyas in the size of «capacity». The criterion «road capacity», in such a way as universal with regard to regulating the Rules, paragraphs, and is loaded into the guschu life neposredstvennno and deliberately linked to the flow of traffic, and - provides a clear vision of its development. Freedom of movement here is supported by real actions its implementation, which, in turn, suggests the next step «pereaktsentovke» Regulation. 
  You must once and for all fiscal functions and divide conventional-regulatory nature of the right. Without the convention, the treaty (for example, the «right-or left-hand», about the meaning of symbols: «signs», «razmetok», «signal», on «the provision of benefits», on «order maneuvering», etc.) in traffic, of course, can not do, but the «automatic» punishment for its violation requires a major adjustment, namely, - «delayed execution». For this postulated second (as well as the «first» - also aimed at guaranteeing the «freedom») a new principle: all the signs, the restrictions and requirements of the Regulations, a priori - conventional, ie, the fiscal function of «is activated» only when the « insured event ». In other words, if you «broke the rules», but in reality did not create anyone to interfere with the movement (and Pace - an emergency situation or a situation), the breach as if it was not - it «is not considered to be». But if you have a direct, active threat to the «accomplices movement» - lyubezen be responsible to the fullest extent of the ... 
  «Conditionality» underlies the concept of «convention», as a «social contract». But how can that has been offensive to some of the same rake: the «virtual trespasses» pay real - tangible losses are of the same purse? «Hunting for Witches» - perhaps the most exciting in the history of occupation, to the satisfaction of «natural instincts» narrow minds, but the «head and two ears» still not a criterion of truth, no absolute guide to action for the «between the ears» - because only the intended probably (!) - «sequence». Who and what was worse, when I «to pass on the red light», «crossed the solid line», «more than the rate», etc., but anyone and anything not created an imminent threat? How I have no eyes, so that slowed down in front of «crossing», to assess the situation and, if loosely, to pass without stopping at the sign «STOP»? Give me (and who?) «Extra opportunity», that «Finally make sure», which, having lost at the speed of «grip with the road» (to turn it on a slippery surface, due to a sharp maneuver ...), I can «fly away» not only in the ditch - that is, do not clear in advance that I should have ABOUT THIS «some idea»? Etc. and so on .... Who is he, this will never sniff the exhaust gas «Parliament», that requires a myriad of totally unnecessary in the real action? Why is the driver or pedestrian should not be guided by the principle of «reasonably necessary», and «HIS» rectilinearly-stereotyped cliches, always and under all circumstances? Is it, finally, the difference to the established rules of «formal» violations and «real», due to the danger and traffic? 
  We can prichitaya, many times as you like to ask these and similar «rhetorical questions», not getting what is not intelligible - no reply until cleanse Regulation of «Art eloquence», in the minds of zasevshey «Dogma Security», cover your eyes in the long run effective ways of enhancing it. «Faulty» - the natural (and often - and necessary) «EVIL» vehicular traffic, but that is not all «his evil», if not taken seriously into account «traces of tears» zaformalizirovannyh dushonok «verbalist» on rascherchennoy in lineechku «writing paper ». and even more clearly - do «not evil», if you do not have any «natural», or «psychological» effects. Therefore, (unless, of course, does not eliminate the «car», and at the same time - and «Wheel», as a phenomenon) minimization only «extreme» movement itself - the only rational way to «curb», requiring concentration but not «vaasche for violations» but on the nodal points, at that - not the movement itself, «nominative», a motion «specific» - is the vehicle - where people «to truly» hurt. 
  Not everyone, of course, the traffic can be indiscriminately called «conditional», but the «rules» and did not even try to find here «fine line». Check «head» to a tunnel with one-way «to limit the probability» can be as frightening on the effects, like crossing the railway line «with the lowered barrier» to the approaching train. But all of these and similar cases almost no fair probability «an outcome», that is, of course, leads them beyond the «principle of conditionality» the rules and can be provided «as an exception», and, moreover, «place of existence of bottlenecks» should Certainly to be equipped in such a way as to remove all doubts «in its conditionality». It is important to remember «Why a car» and its specificity as «individually managed funds». No end to limit the speed of movement, then go against the objective development of life - it is like to ride on the elephant at one of its ballast prigruziv - only that he «was in fact», to «surplus energy» not lost in vain. Speed - the main advantage of the movement in the car, but even in the «Fomule-1» no one expects to enter in turn with the notorious abuse of a reasonable maximum. There is no other force that «into» kept me from a «trigger pressed to the floor», except the instinct of self-awareness and the inevitability of catastrophic consequences if I «not spravlyus at». Not «rate», as the loss of control, loss of control over the movement, is the cause of the accident, so userednennaya «target velocity» (no more than «60» in the city and no more than 110 km / hr on the highway) - the same nonsense as «leveling socialism». In fact, «and Kose clear», that everything here «subjective factors» - driving skills, psychophysiological reactions, in the choice of the speed at which a driver with confidence for themselves "the situation in advance. «Speed limit» - of «interest» limit as the risk of balancing on the brink «adhesion to the road surface», but whether the rules come from the one's that «sport» and enter «restriction (no limit - a« standard ») speeds» - which is the same case as «take care of my security», - not taking into account neither the level of my skills or my culture of driving, or my personal qualities, which may be much higher «middle», as well as significantly lower. Existing «Rules» originally targeted at a minimum of driving skills, podgonyaya «all the rest» by «dwarfish rank». But the reason it is ignored, that the decisive factor in increasing the level of security is exactly the same on the other «thickening of» the end of this showy to «stick heads» club - in the «improvement», not «cutting». 
  Anything other than empty slogans and declarations, except equating «road» to «tracks», except for «leveling» Person (nuts that «time» intertwine so tuzhe than perfect «steering tool» in her hands) - Regulation does not imply and not stimulated, while that «fateful for safety» Process Improvement at the mercy of the elements «personal interest». But is it not obvious that the increased capacity, the ideal route, seeking to limit «intensity» long tolerated amateurism that improving security is here almost untapped «public policy» reserve? While the introduction of new principles in the «Rules» - on the contrary, involves both raising the minimum strip driving skills, and differentiation of drivers by category «access speed» - as a matter of course the result of the implementation «freedom of movement». 
  All the above does not require the «capital», mostly - «bumagomaratelnyh» cost, and - goodwill legislator and the regulatory efforts of the artists. «Stroke of the pen», a principled approach - and the problem, «which - WHO» and that only grows as strangles cancer may be «eliminated by root», in its rotten foundation. Recognition «conditionality standards» and the introduction of priority «road capacity» does not undo the regulatory nature of the right, not a single reasonable dezavuiruet section or paragraph. How it all went well and will go with the all the same «main provisions» regulating the movement of state documents, except that - vzdohnuv freely and get rid of petty pridirok hassle on the roads. As the Constitution - only the guarantor of my subjective right to exist in a society which I have yet to implement its limits, and rules can «constitution», only the traffic flow as a result of their unification - that they are «one at all» and «all» - it is not «skopische obedient herd cattle», but the amount of «Every» - with its own «kazhdoprisnym right» to samoosuschestvlenie. 
  Conditionality «Regulatory Rules» does not mean that «it is now possible» to travel freely and reckless «at a red light» or «by brick», cross «axle» and объезжать column «on vstrechke» or disperse pedestrians «with zebra». The mere possibility of «real insurance case» and then - certainly a cause «fiscal effect» Rules to intervene, ie, against «the inevitability of punishment» se New Treatment «nothing is», and in no way it would not preclude. Moreover, it implies «Unconditional Sanctions» for seemingly minor in the current standards «trespasses» - and precisely because of the priority «capacity»: any vehicle in the parking lot «nepolozhennom place» in the context of the ongoing traffic on all lanes - a clear attempt to «Rules of the spirit» and a proximate cause of reducing the capacity of roads is subject to immediate elimination. Same culprits accident «middle way» to be subject to additional «nemeryannym fine» for the creation of their making obstacles movement - taking into account the time factor and the «loss». Broken and stuck in the flow of the machine now would not «Achilles heel» for other drivers «of the environment», and «money trouble» its owner ... The total removal of these and many other «subjective obstacles» with roads now much to increase their «bandwidth ability »- whether it is in this vein, proposed that, in turn, would entail« on nitochke »and other series of« positive effects ». 
  To some, perhaps, will not rest discretion here «screaming contradiction» between, say, a declaration «convention» and «automaticity unconditionality» administrative penalties for certain violations. But such accusations «logical inconsistencies» easily removed when one considers that «bandwidth» and «reserve» - did not amount to the principles and the principles of hierarchy, where the «first» - he «leading», the main thing that puts a priority of the relevant restrictions on his reporting arrangements. Similarly, you can take and possible recriminations in the «useless» Reform: say, in the «rush hour» and in «narrow streams» virtually any violation of the rules will be «absolute», and hence the effect of «conventionalities innovation» is reduced to zero, because «hit by» the most painful points of motion. But the rules only regulate the movement and not the task of «edit» objective circumstances: on the «efficiency» can be described only in terms of existing roads within their regulatory «capacity». Thus, it is clear - they may not be required to «eliminate jams», but only out of necessity - to separate «grains of darnel». And here comes into force on self «New Rules» - what in principle is not in the «old». What's even more «than cork» annoying on the road - not as candid «hooliganism», «indiscrimination» or «stupidity»? At the peak traffic on mainly activated «fiscal strength» Rules, which «will not go» and it is precisely against the «excess negative» and focused. Loutishness «avtobespredelschika», wishing for someone else's expense «cheat destiny» and «cork», now from the «formal offenses» moved to «attention zone» Regulation as blatant disregard of its leading principle, just the same - like «amateurish helplessness» or «pitch avtoglupost» in decision-making. This «new interpretation» Rules requires vision TOTAL «hours», and not just supersaturated voltage «hour», and the whole «long road» - c «bottle neck» narrowing their objectively «small section». And another: «conditional principle» surplus «already» suffice, and the time and place where «Razgulyai» - ie, the movement of real savings by reducing the «amount of movements». Balancing on the brink «convention» and «unconditionality», thus, is by no means «futile occupation», but vice versa - automatically activates one or another (fiscal or conditionally) necessary at this time «potential feature» Regulation in accordance with the pressing needs of the movement . 
  Since the power of the government machinery will not pulverize, will not work «a», at idle, but will focus solely on countering Molech roads - does not mean «rampant anarchy in the rear», but on the contrary, it is directed against it and -- against non-formal and the actual manifestation of it. These «manifestation» today why «blossom to full flower», that does not meet the systematic (but only - «formal total») counter that, the vast majority of cases, «proskakivayut» past the attention of the «competent authority», engaged in «at work» for some reason, usually their own «urgent affairs». 
  Our GBDD-shniki have long become «byword». They are not just «a nightmare on the roads», they are - the personification of the repressive spirit of law enforcement officers and more than - the inhuman essence of all public bureaucracy. No one and nothing they could do nothing.
There are re - «ЗАРАБАТЫВАТЬ» and the burrow is able to discredit any ideology, any «national idea». 
  But is only removed from the Rules of «educational function», causal linked to «lozungovoy security», ie - «Believe people», and give yourself traffic participants cared about their safety (as it actually is, in fact) and to deny inspectors the right to interfere with the movement of wanton - and suddenly «all will be in their places». Lose their meaning «ambush with radars», protocol (that bish - empty) statements about the «work», «sweep under the comb» everybody formal arraignment «in terms of the letter» Rules, etc. Life itself would send inspectors to spearhead the activities of «pain points» traffic on «undoing knots», to search for and elimination of interference in real traffic and road capacity. «Zhirkov», perhaps, they have diminished - would have to «drive» for «trimmed hooligans» and «prescribed Krendelev» drunkard; poryskat «flows» in the search for the causes of retardation, to evacuate all of a sudden there arose or syam «movable and immovable» obstacle movement etc. But, first, the meaning of this work will be directly linked to its «social purpose», secondly, the change (think - the better) the quality of vehicular traffic, and thirdly, as a result - increased security, as to bring minimum for «supervise road authorities» opportunity to simulate the activity - to search for «black cat in a dark room». In the traffic police are well aware of the «narrow field» on their sites, and if the criterion for assessing the «service» is based on the value of «capacity», then there is an objective indicator of their activity, ie, realized, finally, the notorious «social control». 
  Perhaps all this «harder» road work, but we do something, «ordinary citizens», which until this case - and, as the saying goes, «who is now easy»! Let the legislator determines what evidence (certificates) are sufficient for the fixation and processing of real violations, although the Ministry provides its employees the necessary technical means, let the inspectors themselves develop and improve specific skills, so as not to err in the visual determination of the offender (say, «drunk driving », which, incidentally, could not create« hindrance to the movement »), and not be subject to cross-complaint or lawsuit. All participants in the movement initially, «static», must be equal and only «dynamics» on the road can be identified their «unequal», ie - Under a single criterion of respect to this «movement». Thus, «normal driver» given a real chance to be on an equal footing with supervise roads «bodies», where the current rules - is a clear imbalance «pereizbytka power». The main thing is that the proposed «innovation», - is that «the rules of the game» were true and known to all, the traffic (including the «people in uniform») - are equal and «prezumptsionno innocence», and the repressive measures - are adequate and strictly selective . 
  If the total sum up «a new convention on the road», its advantages vis-à-«to previous» could be summarized as follows: 
  1. Factors of freedom of movement to open a new, «freed from dogmatic thinking», space: how to postulate «road capacity» and the principle of «convention» opens outlet «zapressovannym» potency of motion, removing excess strain on his «too overheated shocks wires». Is difficult to overestimate, even though it is small, but significant weight-objective «regression» - so to say, «a breath of fresh air» - In only exacerbate the course of time, and the development of irreversible ZHUTI road «seal» and «intensity». 
  2. The principle of priority «road capacity» little fact that just the economic benefits, as well as focus on improving the speed of flow, but also for the very substance of his opens the way to the real safety on the roads, in fact, extending the «freedom of maneuver», - as opposed to stagnant pool of priority «Prior security». 
  3. Declaration «conditionality rules» also improves system security, since the shift penalties for «breach» of the formal - in the real sector, that «it is in life» hinders movement - thus, «sole» focusing power of the spray current state mechanism at the nodal points of motion - in particular «causes dangers». 
  4. «Letter» and «spirit» Rules Finally, the gain equality = «harmonic balance»: as a full equivalent to a full real - thus, a party for each «Layout Attorney» for each turning in a paper «Road of Truth» - close understandable, fair, and consequently of the internal «harmony with the spirit» - for «strict performance». 
  5. As a result, «innovation» is removed and counterpoint confrontation Inspectorate and the main driver of mass - more than «someone» interested in the freedom of movement and eliminating entirely unnecessary - «unmotivated», «subjective» - he obstacles that potentially has a clear tendency to convergence «interests», to cooperate. 
  6. Concentrating efforts on the movement itself, at its nodal points, and gives new impetus to improve the driving skills of stimulus: the element of «personal interest» it is elevated to the rank of interest «public», targeting, for which the task of improving the «margin» drivers in critical situations from the sideline « the previous rules »appears-priority,« prime ». 
  Etc. and so on ... .. 
  It would seem, «direct link» postulates «the rules must be respected» to safety on the roads - the thing is so obvious that the «DISCUSSION NOT BE» and therefore unconditionally «adopted a priori» - WITHOUT EVIDENCE. But persistent delusions of mankind arose «explicit» - that even two hundred years ago with impartial severity stigmatize Goethe: «... Hence the delusion of delusion. A man finds himself in action and can not resist the question on the reasons. As inert substance, it will catch the next one as the best and this calms down ». And really, how many thousands of years (!) People around the globe have been assured that the sun «rises» and «go», ie, «is moved across the sky»!? Is not such «a priori-visual postulates» растаяли film in history? Nailuchshest «immediate explanation» often extremely «convincing», but in his time brilliantly syroniziroval Nietzsche in «note to asses»: «... that convinces thus have not yet become true: it is only convincing»!! ... Examples «dismemberment »(= disavowal) of the prevailing long illusory« representations-evident », you can multiply and multiply, but already it is clear that for us it would be absurd to remain at the level of primitive logic, does not understand the« neraschlenennoy convincingly »original a priori. For the «material» loss of vehicular traffic stretches monstrous plume geometric progression losses «moral» - so we only have the right to admit them and helplessly sit idly by and waiting for the filing with the West, in the «unprecedented best-» and «progressively oriented» which has no experience and close «analogue» of this type of reform ... «behemoth oblo, naughty, enormous, and stozevno layay» - whether to sacrifice a lamb insatiability Moloch roads, as the inevitable evil, or grow up, finally, of the «short shtanishek» and determined that the image of « mythological », illusory, and that - certainly,« Earth », urgent?



 
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh